6
Aug
Maybe I should go a little easier on criticizing our inefficiency and all the soccer mom’s driving their SUVs. Check out this article. Apparently walking may do more harm to our environment than driving our cars. Here’s a snippet:
The climate could benefit if people avoided exercise, ate less and became couch potatoes. Provided, of course, they remembered to switch off the TV rather than leaving it on standby.
Oh, what confusing times we live in.
I think I’ll keep huggin’ my tree. Did they talk about how expensive medical stuff would be because you would be so unfit?
So many pros and cons. Who wants to go swim laps with me =P
I understand the rhetoric this writer’s trying to use here–showing how we make an impact on the environment simply by existing–to dispel some “green myths.” But I’ve seen little from this side of the argument in the way of constructive feedback. The refutation of these myths alone, like this article, just leaves people feeling disillusioned. To me, it communicates one thing: Why do anything if it’s all bad? I’d really like to see something more constructive come from the so-called deniers.
So, no offense, but you need to spice up your blog a little bit 
So if we all die it will be better for the environment. Yay.
